Diana in the Docks free essay sample

She was arguing that her privacy had been breached when Bryce Taylor, the manager at her gym, set up a camera in the ceiling and took photos of her using the leg press and sold the photos to the Mirror. ? Defendant: Bryce Taylor was the defendant. He was in fact being represented by Geoffrey Robertson himself. Robertson was assigned y the court to be Taylor’s lawyer to try and make sure the trial was as fair as possible. Robertson believed that the gym was as public as could be and that anyone could have taken photos from outside the street, so what difference did it make that they were taken inside the gym. ? â€Å"LA Fitness (the gym) comprised one giant room†¦ so that everybody could see everybody else. The leg-press machine that Diana used was in front of a vast glass wall looking onto a public thoroughfare†¦ she had not objected when children pressed their noses to the glass and exclaimed, ‘Look at the Princess of Wales! ’† On the other hand, he raised the point that she could have been entitled to at least a little bit of privacy, that the manager â€Å"owed Diana some measures of consideration†. We will write a custom essay sample on Diana in the Docks or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page ? Robertson argued that Diana was mostly to blame for the potential breach in privacy and should have been more careful with her action and known that she would not have privacy in such a public place.. Many people saw her there everyday, so what difference did it make if the images of her working out were frozen and replicated in a newspaper. â€Å"Offering her honorary membership†¦ by saving 500 pounds/year she weakened her claim that he owed her confidentiality, because she had not paid for any. † â€Å"She acquired no enforceable rights against covert photography. The Mirror had depicted what dozens of members had seen with their own eyes, and what children has seen when they gawked through the window. † ? Robertson explains how Taylor sought advice before taking the photos so he could be sure there was no law against it ? â€Å"He had gone to see a leading solicitor who told him hat since there was no protection for privacy his actions were not illegal and on that assurance he had gone ahead. † ? â€Å"Diana had been the victim of a dirty trick which provided windfall profits to undeserving people. But could she, and if so, should she, sue? † – Robertson’s opinion is that Taylor should not have done what he did even if it wasn’t illegal and was just a â€Å"trick†. The rhetorical question demonstrates a shift in tone and prepares the reader for the detail of the case that was to come. ? Could the Justice Game be won convincingly and without damage to herself† Justice comes at a price when it really shouldn’t because the person receiving justice is in the right and should not have to pay in any way for that. ? â€Å"I might have preferred to act for the princess. † shows Robertson’s personal opinion. Suggests he may have struggled to argue for Taylor because he didn’t truly believe he was right. But did this matter? † Rhetorical question shows shift in perspective; takes recount from defending Taylor to defending Diana. â€Å"But Diana wanted privacy only when it suited her. † has. As a popular figure, she really doesn’t have a choice over the privacy and yet she wants to control it. ? This is almost insulting fame and the influence it â€Å"Of privacy which requires protection not because of any contract or confidentiality or fiduciary relationship, but by reason of our humanity. † This is related to the preface when Robertson says that â€Å"this book argues for humanity† ? whole book and into this case as well rehearse for her cross examination† theatre metaphor has been continued throughout. We have become much more concerned about free speech violations than privacy violations: the former attack the undivided attention of human rights organisations while the latter are rarely condemned† This means that free speech and privacy cannot work ? together and the laws must be specific to the situation to determine which one has been breached to a higher degree. ? There was a deal done between the parties which paid Taylor to not go to court and which saved Diana from any embarrassment. The case never went to trial.